By: Tani
Jantsang
Here are 9 simple statements I'm sure you've read (on second
thought, maybe you never read them; in which case, I listed them). Anton LaVey
made them.
But did you READ them? They are, indeed, simple statements and
I have to seriously wonder who doesn't already know all of it if their IQ is over
50 and they are able to read words.
They are as simple, if not simpler,
than the colorful way one might define something that one must be able to FEEL
in order to grasp. The point is that everyone does these things in these statements,
whether or not they admit they do these things. Apparently LaVey, when
writing them, was obsessed with the fact that people did these things but then
lied about doing them. He called it "Christian" hypocrisy. Christian? A simpler
way to say that is, "they lie about things they do." The majority of his writings
seem to Will-Focus on the herd and their doings and hypocrisies. Some of us don't
tend to notice that or care about it, our Wills are not Focused on other people's
business unless something catches our eye in the positive sense and looks like
FUN.
And so my question is this: why would a person on the Left Hand Path
be concerned about what other people do, don't do, or lie about doing? Did LaVey
enjoy "indulging" in grouching about other people that he shouldn't have been
concerned about? Well, Christians are concerned about that too: you see, lying
is "wrong" or, ahem, it's a sin. So it's established that both the Christians
and the LaVeyans care about people lying about what they do. OK.
This all
has absolutely nothing to do with the Dark Force, Black Flame, or the solitary
Left Hand Path that only the individual can be on. You can't share such a path
with anyone else - and there are no rules or dogmas that can possibly be applied
to The Path One is On.
Well, here are these 9 statements again with some
comments from me, which will show anyone with a keen sense of savvy that the entire
point of these are moot. NO ONE "obeys" them just as Christians don't "obey" their
commandments or rules. NO ONE. LaVey himself didn't. His followers (heh, followers?)
break every single one of these on a daily basis. The entirety of these are written
TO the herd, focused ON the herd, like so much preaching. Ooops, the herd might
not be paying attention, tish tish!. Does anyone on the Left Hand Path CARE? If
so, then they are overstepping their own boundaries and butting into the business
of others. Heh, deeds and actions prove that these LaVeyans and similar types
"into Satan" are the first to CARE about what others think, how others change
their opinions with the flux of reality, they even care about what others eat
or enjoy watching for entertainment! They CARE. They aren't even on the Right
Hand Path. They are NOWHERE.
If you want to know what the Dark Tradition
says SATAN represents, see below after this article. What we say SATAN represents
has nothing whatsoever to do with the "herd."
LaVey said Satan represents:
(it's in quotes):
"1. Indulgence instead of abstinence."
Do you
know what abstinence is? Gotta diet, don't eat that. Don't smoke. Don't drink.
Don't eat meat. Don't make love. Don't dance. Don't sing. Don't talk loud. Don't
laugh. Don't play. Don't be rude. Above all don't be rude, be polite and kow-tow
to lies. CENSOR yourself, GAG yourself lest you speak from your HEART some undefiled
truth or REAL FEELING. KILL your feelings, DENY them. DENY the flesh but strive
and strive to be something else. ALL of that is abstinence a/k/a "the repression
of the heart." Let Christian or other inquisitors in your families, in society,
lord it over you with rubbish "questions" as they PRETEND they are actually asking
a question they WANT the answer to. NO, they don't want the answer, they just
want to JUDGE you and make you have to JUSTIFY YOURSELF to them or at least try
to make you FEEL THE NEED to justify yourself or your feelings or opinions (which
might change from day to day since LIFE is all about change) when you have only
TOLD THE TRUTH about something that you think or feel: That's TABOO in society.
"Mom, that food tastes like SHIT, ptewy!" Letting them get away with this is a
form of abstinence!
Do you know what indulgence is? Indulgence is the REFUSAL
to let ANYONE do this to you, to REFUSE to censor yourself or straight-jacket
your opinions, to SPEAK from the heart, to DO what you feel and want. THAT is
indulgence. It is a LACK of judging oneself like the dualists tend to do. Indulgence
is BEING. It is not BEING LIKED. IT IS LIKING TO BE!! INDULGE MEANS: I LIKE, I
WANT, I DO, and it is also I DO NOT LIKE, I DO NOT WANT, THEREFORE I DO NOT DO.
It's both!
Peer group pressure? This term means nothing to a natural born
Satanist and by that I mean a person innately on the Left Handed Path (I definitely
do NOT mean anyone in these satanic organizations who are all about peer group
pressure!). There are no peers. It ONLY works on ABSTAINERS. THINK IN THE INNER
way about this. Peer groups get you to abstain from BEING YOURSELF! You do the
"in thing" for the group (no matter what the group is), no matter if you FEEL
like NOT doing it. That's abstinence too, in an inner sense.
Now, the problem
is this: People in LaVeyan type organizations, example, often abstain from eating
foods they might love to eat; they abstain because they are obese. Therefore they
are indulging in their diets. Heh. Abstaining IS a form of indulgence, in every
respect. A thief might abstain from stealing food for his starving family
if he is AFRAID to get caught. That's not abstaining; that's fear of the law;
he is indulging in keeping himself out of jail. People who claim they abstain,
but indulge in secret - well, that's nobody's business what they do, right? Right!
Obviously, they are acting the role of abstainer for other people to see
for some purpose that obviously gains them something. They are indulging in being
an exhibitionist abstainer. Why would LaVeyans preach to them or care? Christians
care because it's a spiritual matter to them and involved their religious rules.
All of this is outer behavior.
"2. Vital Existence instead of spiritual
pipe-dreams."
Do you know what Vital existence is? The 2 point up star
is a glyph for this. It means LIBERATION, it means normal kundalini flow and release.
It means VITALITY, the physical quality of BEING VITAL AND WHOLE.
Do you
know what a pipe-dream is? Fake belief in disembodied entities out there. Fake
creators of man. Fake idealized states of being, like kingdom of god or various
other-earthly ideas where you are no longer a body but just a disembodied mind.
It means a pipe dream, a wannabe, a LIE and a "robe" you wear while you PRETEND
to be what you ARE NOT, pretend to know things you KNOW NOTHING about It is belief
grounded not on TRUTH, but on a fantasy that society calls a "religion" or "faith."
Spiritual pipe-dreams cover a lot of things. Some religions have MORE pipe-dreams
than others. But the definition, even here, is confusing and misleading - it has
to be qualified.
The problem here is that "spiritual pipe dreaming" doesn't
mean having a laid-back belief or even convinced Gnosis, in a Divine Hand or Deity
or "something like that" because you sincerely DO see it in nature everywhere,
or sincerely feel it within. It's more or less the DESIRE FOR "something other"
due to life being not so good. A pipe dream is also where a person is "gonna do"
something, and it's usually something he is never going to do and can't do. Big
Plans. Big Ideas. They all fall to nothing for pipe dreamers. Pipe dreaming is
desiring some Big Parent Up there who's going to come and FIX things (for you,
of course) or get rid of your enemies like some goody goody or bad-assed Superhero
kiddy crap.
"3. Undefiled Wisdom instead of hypocritical self-deceit."
Undefiled Wisdom or Inner Truth is knowing the HARD TRUTH about yourself,
without the bullshit or facades or pretends. I.e., if you are STUPID, then RECOGNIZE
IT. It's also the ability to "see through" propaganda, especially the type put
forth by the media and government and consumerist crap.
Hypocritical self-deceit?
It's when you claim to be something you are NOT and you BELIEVE IT YOURSELF. Lots
of neo-satanists in the "rebellion phase" and stuck in this phase are doing self-deceit
LOUDLY. When you lie to another person and deceive THEM, this is OK! It's a viable
evolutionary strategy! EVERYONE does it! When you deceive yourself, you are schizoid
OR WORSE. Hypocritical deceit is just what Oral Roberts did when he announced
on TV, "Give me millions or God will kill me." Well, he got his millions, people
gave it to him of their own free will. That's free choice. But hypocritical SELF
deceit is when e.g., you claim to be in favor of Freedom of Speech and yet are
your OWN inner censor, you cry over rude words that might "hurt someone's feelings"
even though the words are true, or at least a truthful OPINION you have. Such
a person IS NOT and CAN NOT BE in favor of Free Speech because they do not even
PRACTICE IT. They deceive themselves in thinking they are for it. It is deceiving
yourself to be ANYTHING you are not. Such people tend to go into ballistic reaction
mode when someone who really knows something comes around and smashes their little
fortress of lies. Then they can be seen to go into self-destructive behavior and
also retreat to their old faith: BELIEF in lies despite evidence to the contrary
(or they join neo-Satan organizations that are all about nothing). Self-deceit
is a tall subject because 99% of the CULTURAL Christian world LIVES AND BREATHES
in a Sea of Lies: their own culture. They are not self-aware enough to even know
that they deceive themselves. They are the ENEMIES of self sincerity inside their
own selves. Hypocritical self-deceit, example, is the fool screaming about "sexual
freedom and rights" when he never even GOT OFF! Such a confused, obscured person
really has another agenda aside from "FREEDOM TO WORK if you are sexually different."
Who would know about his personal crap if he didn't blab it all over to UNinterested
others? His agenda has more to do with ACCEPTENCE BY OTHERS since he obviously
does not accept himself. You can spot them: they'd try to PREACH this bullshit
to people who have been HAVING SEX quite naturally since they were 13 years old
or so. This is hypocritical SELF-deceit. This is not the same thing as a hypocrite!
SELF-deceit is not the same as deceiving others. LaVey apparently thought that
people going to the Christian meetings he indulged in watching and writing about,
were deceiving themselves. Um: NO! Not hardly.
"4. Kindness to those who
deserve it, instead of love wasted on ingrates."
Yes, people are often
raised by FIENDS and told that this is love: so they grow up in this way. They
automatically are chummy with scum. Like the "girlfriend" who does you a "favor"
and gets you some crack cocaine when you are pregnant. They think this is a "friend."
They don't recognize real kindness: they react to it as if the person is either
an enemy to fear or a doormat to be walked on. We who are not like this KNOW what
this statement means. It doesn't NEED explanation. But to the damaged (so many
of whom flock into Satan organizations that have nothing but other omega wolves
in them wanting to HURT someone or bully them) the concept of kindness or joy
is unfathomable. They grow up loving or WANTING TO LOVE parents or spouses or
siblings or even schoolmates that any healthy normal animal would want to SHOOT
in vengeance instead. The peculiar thing is that most people from such abusive
situations (any kind of repetitive abuse and from anyone) run away from it by
joining abusive organizations where they are, once again, told what to do. They
run away from gloom and ugliness and do so by running into WORSE gloom and ugliness,
and the fools think it's satanic. Well, BOTH are satanic in the Webster's Dictionary
sense and in the Biblical sense. (Look up Stockholm Syndrome.) They are apt to
see Pinhead of Hellraiser as a cool character, yet they are incapable of seeing
him as the same as what caused them to run to him - an asshole out to hurt people;
they are incapable of seeing him as the Ultimate Tortured Jesus.
The statement
about Love is almost different as one can be kind WITHOUT feeling love. A government
spy can be kind to an enemy in order to obtain information. One can be kind to
a total stranger simply out of animal-human decency. Love is a FEELING, it shines
out of the heart area in a gentle way, like sunshine. It doesn't feel like anything
to BE loved, but it feels like JOY TO love someone OR something. Love comes all
of a sudden, and it goes just as suddenly. Normal healthy people would just let
it go when it's gone and not try to FORCE something to exist when it's gone. When
you do that, Love turns to obligation and then to hate. In the world there is
a lot of love/hate. And we see love/hate is really HATE, not love. Love is writing
a song you are inspired to write. Love is sharing it with another who liked it
too. Love is NOT a bond of clinging as if you are half a person NEEDING another
half. No: that is more a war of Wills because two people are TWO PEOPLE, not ONE.
Love is something klippoths CRAVE, whether it's "divine" love or love of
others. I see they HAVE NO love WITHIN them, not for anything including themselves.
And that is WHY they are kind to enemies and treat others who are truly kind like
doormats. Love has many forms and English is not adequate to define it. There
is the love of a thing or of knowledge, there is kinship love, mother love which
is more of an instinct and quite different, love of an area (feeling at-home,
more like territorial feelings), love of a mate (I don't mean lust, which is felt
in the LOINS). Love is felt in the HEART area of the body, in the chest.
Kindness
can be called compassion and is more like empathy. Christians preach this, but
most of them have ONLY malice and feel good only when they can pretend to lord
it over another, which they do out of inner weakness; they love to "find sinners
and bully or harass them." Many neo-Satanists also do this, they delight in ganging
up on anyone that is "not like them." LaVeyans have done this for decades against
other Satanic organizations, including those that ignored them!
"5. Vengeance
instead of turning the other cheek."
Yes. SMASH. We all know what vengeance
is and what it feels like to want to GET IT. It is something any wild animal feels.
There is nothing sociopathic about it except in a sick, decadent society where
laws are made to protect abject scum. They get by with impunity, mouthing off,
ripping off, as of old, but when the other side is given the freedom to GET EVEN
they pass laws against it. Well, some animals don't care about that! When you
taunt a wild animal that was never tamed enough (civilized?), it might GO AFTER
you and rip off your head. Animals in zoos have been known to do this: it's natural.
People, after reading "Toxic Parents," did what the book said and confronted their
TOXIC parents. Result: a lot of parents ended up being killed by their kids. Our
kind would have EXPECTED it.
"Turning the other cheek" is when you chicken
out and then pretend that you are "above it all." Or it's something Christian
parents have preached to their kids as the kids got tormented and bullied in schools
on a daily basis. In reality this self-deceit FESTERS and poisons the emotions.
I.e., they know they aren't "above striking back;" they know they are AFRAID to
strike back. Often people attempt to "try to like" the HATED ENEMY in an attempt
to NOT FEEL these festering emotions. Nope: it doesn't work. Turning the other
cheek is an inward thing and NOT DOING that doesn't have to mean you have to get
physical vengeance: just SPEAK OUT AND SHOUT IT, at least don't pretend to YOURSELF.
Otherwise, if you really don't want to get even, it's not turning the cheek
then, it's indulging in not caring! As one Satanist I know said, you can throw
a curse on a person, no need for violence and trouble with the law. Well... to
one grown in an inner city WITH violence, that doesn't sound like something carnal
enough.... Even when the curse WORKS, it STILL doesn't feel quite as good as physically
smashing the shit out of the enemy, with your bare hands! Once that's done, you
REALLY don't care about it anymore: the feeling is GONE FOR GOOD.
Hmm,
some might say that wrongs were done to LaVey, at least he FELT that he was wronged
- but the fact of the matter is, he never got vengeance at all. He walled himself
up like a monk instead, and his followers spoke up or encouraged others to jump
into the "holy war." None of it was physical or real.
"6. Responsibility
to the responsible instead of concern for psychic vampires."
Yes, it's
why I refuse to give references when it is clear the person asking for them doesn't
want them, give them direction on what books to study to KNOW what they CLAIM
THEY WANT TO KNOW and they don't read them, but instead vampirize my time asking
me over and over again the same question. LaVeyans do that a lot. "But WHY did
you blah blah" and WHY did you blah blah." Answered 10 times. Are they that stupid?
Yes. Or the type that wants the personal attention on his "problem" and the answer
is all too simple. But they do not just do it, they stall, meander, and want to
TALK ABOUT IT MORE. This is like mental masturbation on YOUR TIME. They want you
to PAY ATTENTION to them, NOTICE that they exist. I let some do this to see them
doing it (study it) and then SHOW THEM what they are DOING: true to form, they
often turn ostrich and rationalize their meandering. When told later on to "fuck
off" they obsess and "flame me," and even creatively invent stories about me -
and they do this for years of their own time (what a waste of time!). They did
it to others too. Some realize what they are doing. Marsh explained psychic vampires
from another direction in his article "Klippoth versus Loners" on www.apodion.com/vad/
Share
what you have with those you like who ARE responsible and who REALLY want it for
self edification or enjoyment: it's easy to tell that kind apart from the lonely
klippoths looking for attention and ASKING for things. Genuine people usually
have things of their own to SHARE BACK with you that they produce from not loneliness,
but a full rich heart; they usually have their OWN JOY OF LIFE and things in common
TO share. The psychic black hole has NOTHING inside to share. Giving things to
such a black hole empty person is like throwing it in the garbage. However if
one of them feels inclined to shower you with gifts, by all means, TAKE THEM -
they are free. You owe them nothing, especially if they offered and you didn't
ask for anything.
"7. Man as just another animal, sometimes better, more
often worse than those that walk on all fours, who, because of his "divine spiritual
and intellectual development," has become the most vicious animal of all."
Note
the quotations LaVey uses. I.e., there is no "divine" spiritual or intellectual
development in man at all. I wonder how many lost sight of those quotes. LaVey
put them in there. Anatomical and neurological knowledge of man's brain shows
that it is just like any other mammal-animal's and there is nothing odd or strange
about it (except for the miswired brains found by neurology that now tells us
WHY some people think up pipe-dreams no matter what they think of and are NOT
ABLE to grasp any kind of truth, and why others, even when SHOWN what they are
doing, are "unable to know" or anosognosic). This type tends to BE dualists. By
that I mean schizoid. Alexithymic. Anosognosic. Man is biologically exactly like
any other animal (we are human animals) but few people have grown up freely in
society wherein this nature was ALLOWED to bloom or grow naturally and NORMALLY.
They are like damaged people and many such people flock to "other worldly" organized
religions. (This is not to say that all organized religion is about other worldly
things! Only a dualist would misread it that way!) They are unable to get a clue
into themselves even when SHOWN. They all try to squirm out of it or make up excuses
no matter how you nail them down. Neurologists found this too in their schizoid
patients and the more schizoid they are, the more they do this. They also notoriously
ego-project. Another word for what they are is HIGHLY REPRESSED to the point that
they have become their own oppressors, or they pay to join organizations where
they are dictated to (hierarchical organizations that even claim to be dictatorships!).
They are their own INNER enemy: example would be a person who is "an enemy" who
tells me he is going to do a crime or did one and then WORRIES that I'll turn
him in! Why did he tell me? Or a person who claims to have had a war with some
enemy and who never imagines that I might ASK that enemy about it. Then if the
person lied, well, if the enemy never heard of him before, he will surely know
about him NOW! Why did he invent this lie and TELL ME? He is his own enemy. Normal
animals don't tend to do things like that. Rats don't deliberately catch themselves
in traps and, after catching ONE rat, it is near impossible to catch ANY OTHERS
in that same trap. But rats infected with parasites often DO begin to like the
smell of cats and walk to up to cats that promptly eat them! The parasites make
the rats behave in a neurologically deranged manner. In all outward appearances,
this rat is behaving like a non-rat, or a klippothic rat.
The problem with
this is that there is something that is definitely non-animal in things some humans
do (and not klippothic either), since no other animal that we are aware of
does such things and we can't know what the 99% extinct animals did. Animals,
all of them, do have culture, society (group, collective, hive, or solitary),
strategies and even technology of a type and MOST human endeavors are analogous;
they are human-ANIMAL based technologies. All of it is based in what they can
know from their own beings, their own bodies and in choices they make in adaptation.
For instance, dolphins use sonar more advanced than anything humans have- but
dolphins don't build it, they have it in their brains to be used; so they use
it. Just like we use our opposable fingered, highly dexterous hands because we
HAVE hands. There is a fine line to be drawn to make the distinction between biologically
based animal behavior and things that are not, which humans do. Humans have been
shown to have been capable of making technology that is wholly outside their biology
- they are inspired, they get an insight from SOMEWHERE and some of these people
who got these insights outright said it came from "not themselves!". Ramanujan,
the 20th century's greatest mathematician, is one example and he clearly
stated this. His calculations were provable, empirical facts! In the Hellenic,
this was known as Daimonic - or genius. But is this good for the human species
in the end? So far, it's not since it causes environmental problems - but we have
only seen the effects of this THUS FAR. (I.e., will global warming be good for
humans and cause, perhaps, a new mutation or adaptation? We don't know, not YET!)
At the time the inventions are created, they seem very good. As time passes, they
turn out to be quite bad. To make it as distinct as I can: making a house, storing
food, even writing things down, are all within our biological/animal nature to
do. We have the bodily parts that just tend to DO such things - so some humans
(not all) adopt these things, preserve them and they become part of a culture.
But getting the idea to turn a solid metal into a liquid and then alloy it in
a precise manner with another metal is not within our biological natures to do.
It's something else. Using petroleum to make plastic is another example of non-animal
behavior. USING spoons or something else to eat food is animal. But making plastic
spoons or sterling silver spoons, or stainless steel spoons is not. Not even remotely!
Aside from that, "humans as a species" do not do such things or invent such things.
VERY FEW humans do this! The rest just do what monkeys do: copy it. Use it.
ALL
animals become destructive, mean-spirited and even self-destructive when there
is OVERPOPULATOIN. Man is no exception.
"8. Satan represents all the so-called
sins, as they all lead to physical, mental or emotional gratification. "
This
is a tricky one for those of us who have a whole other category of sins that are
not related to the Three Monotheistic Religions. If I were to take that at face
value, I'd read that as, "LaVey wants you to be Ignorant, and thinks that Ignorance
will call gratification," since Ignorance is the first and biggest SIN in my culture!
LaVey wants you to be a WIMP, too, he thinks wimps will receive gratification.
That's another SIN in my culture. Nah, I don't think he meant that.
What
is LaVey calling "sins?" Oh, I see: CHRISTIAN STUFF! So then, he wrote this FOR
Christians who'd be familiar with this stuff. Why, of course he did! Every theologian
that ever read his stuff knows this (and dismisses it). OK:
Murder is a
sin in Christianity, "thou shalt not kill." Well, with their Onward Christian
Soldiers and Children's Crusades and Inquisition I used to think that murder,
cultural genocide and even genocide was a VIRTUE in the Christian religion, part
of their "Manifest Destiny Ordained by their God": like: kill people to hurry
them into the Kingdom, or something like that?
When you want vengeance,
well... it sure would feel good to beat the bastard gone. Christians, in deeds
in history, are the most vengeful people on the planet, maybe equal to the Moslems.
Jews have "an eye for an eye." They believe in vengeance. Let's see "thou shalt
not kill." Jews distinguish between killing and murder when they say that in their
own expanded version.
OK, "You should not, or thou shalt not steal." That's
one of those commandments. Theft is a sin too but hunger is a good incentive to
steal food if you can't get it otherwise. In such a situation, is the hungry,
potential thief to blame or is the garbage economic system to blame? Blame blame
blame, blame the devil!
Another sin: "thou shalt not suffer a witch to
live." Well, seems to me that the LaVeyans feel the same way - they are very hateful
toward Wicca.
And so forth. Sorry, I don't know the other Christian sins
and am seriously too lazy to go look them up and not sure where I'd find them
- they're not on Page One of their Bible; that's where I looked. OH, I remember
a few, "don't adulterate" (in the Hebrew that means to not make their tribe members
impure by mixing), and don't worship idols. Oh, does it cause gratification to
adulterate things or worship idols? Maybe. Whatever. Christians have been adulterating
for centuries, even by raping people in foreign nations, probably because they
don't know what the Hebrew meaning is.
I can assure the reader that LaVey
NEVER went and broke all those Christian sins because our laws (in fact, MOST
laws of most lands, even non-Christians lands), have incorporated most of them
into law, e.g., stealing, murder, laws against doing that, and religious intolerance
in many places, too - these days that might take the form of "Thou shalt not suffer
a Fundamentalist Moslem to live?". LaVey wasn't telling anyone to go out and break
the laws of the country, most of which are founded on the Three Monotheisms anyway.
Though, on seriously looking at deeds, one has to wonder about what LaVey encourages
his clubbies to do, when LaVey "dictates" to his club members to behave like a
den of ravening wolves and go after anti-LaVeyans like Waffen SS Storm Troopers
would: is that en enjoinder to murder people? Some might think it is and they
do threaten people. Oddly, when others threaten them back, they whine to the skies
about it. (They should be reminded that the Red Army smashed the Storm Troopers.
HA HA metaphor). They never go after Christians or seriously anti-Satanic groups.
They go after OTHER Satanic organizations, or they get their non-member supporters
to do it. How odd!
So we have to figure out what LaVey meant by all this
sin bullshit. .... ....
Aha! I got it! He meant the SO-CALLED Christian
sins that have NOTHING TO DO with the law, like greed, lust and other things he
spelled out in the Satanic Bible in an effort to turn the Christian sins upside
down. Wait, Christians practice greed to a great extent (they absolutely love
capitalism!) and lust doesn't seem to bother them either so long as they do various
taboo forms of it in secret. (Too bad he didn't know what the original Greek for
these "sins" were. Too bad the Christians don't know it either! HAH! Now that
I DO know: "Another Look at Christianity" - read it.)
Sure some of these things, interpreted in street talk and used tongue-in-cheek,
feel good sometimes. We'd more likely say that feelings of wanting vengeance means
that someone already messed with you. This is a great disturbance of one's inner
peace and we'd rather NOT indulge in that garbage unless necessary - as a CHORE.
Organized Religions are preeminent joy-killers and what's insidious about them
is that, once they've de-humanized your animal nature, you tend to perpetuate
the repression against yourself when the authority is long gone; or you replace
the old authority with a new one and even pay him to be your dictator. Or you
might delude yourself into getting into "sexual freedom movements" and preach
the CHORE of sex while you never even get off. Don't think this is just about
sex. It's not. These preachy idiots are unable to even be aware of naturally FREER
PEOPLE all around them that IGNORE them, yet at the same time, they are VERY aware
of them on some level.
" 9. Satan has been the best friend the church has
ever had, as he has kept it in business all these years."
So then, LaVey
intended to do the Fundamentalists and the Pope a BIG FAVOR? Um, was he paid by
them to do this? Good question! This statement needs an update. WHICH CHURCH
is this Webster's Dictionary Satan a friend to? Well, this can't mean the Jewish
Temple because they don't have a devil. And it can't mean Eastern clans or cults
or Islam because they don't have this idea either. Islam tends to use "Great Satan"
to mean the U.S.A. It can't mean Hindus because almost all the Hindu "deities"
are viewed as Devils, more or less. So then, it means the Christians, their churches.
These 9 statements, in my opinion can't be read in isolation as if they
are split off from each other. They form ONE BIG PICTURE of a thing to grasp and
the thing being grasped is extremely simple. People already do all those things,
whether they admit it or not. LaVey's concern seems to be the same as the
Christian concern: people do these things and then LIE about it. Yeah, so what?
What has this got to do with the Left Handed Solitary Path? Nothing.
Let's
look at these statements then, and make Something of it: One can see A KIND of
natural animal. The description, except for the last statement about "churches,"
applies to every single animal on earth, including worms, insects, sea life, etc.
They don't tend to INVENT pipe dream sick-houses like churches nor do they set
up shops where lies and fantasies can be sold to pipe-dreamers (consumer suckers
included). But the other statements literally DO apply to every single living
thing on the planet.
These statements FLOW INTO each other and on a very
high level they are all like ONE STATEMENT since the fully liberated person automatically
IS all these things and the repressed types automatically are the ENEMIES of it,
despite the "movements" they get into where they try to deny they are enemies
of it. E.g.: The person who can't even speak from his own heart CAN NOT BE for
free speech. It's not possible.
Where LaVey, on page 16, bottom of page,
said: "The DEVIL was much MORE THAN JUST that (anti Christianity, anthropomorphic
devil: things LaVey cites as having happened in the past). Satan represented a
dark, HIDDEN FORCE IN NATURE that was responsible (A CAUSAL AGENT) for the workings
of earthly affairs for which science and religion had no explanation and no control."
He then goes on to explain how he felt it first in small ways. Yes, but his organization
is not the organization that has any information on this Dark Force in Nature.
The SR organization has ALL the information on it. WE ARE THE DARK DOCTRINE ORG!
And it's the only org in the world that explains it "for Satanists" in
a very pure form.
What LaVey was talking about is NORMAL ANIMAL NATURE
which, indeed, the ENEMY has called "of Satan" in Christian religion.
All
we did was show that science SURELY DOES have a kind of explanation, even a formula,
for this Dark Force. Anton LaVey may have felt it once, but he didn't really know
anything about it, and this HIDDEN FORCE doesn't JUST affect earthly affairs (that's
why we called it COSMOCRATOR). And we named this force: That Which causes entropy
and more, much more. We explain all aspects of it. We showed that OH YES, the
Christians (some authorities, like Augustine) SURELY DID define this: their scholars
described it by telling us WHAT THE DEVIL DOES IN NATURE as LORD OF THIS WORLD
according to their view. They must have ALSO felt it to be able to have described
it so well, and yet they hardly knew what ANY KIND of force was. They know this
force as THE THING THEY FEEL AT ODDS WITH!! Consider that! They feel at odds with:
LIFE!
On a much higher level of "clarity" there is much to say about the
interwovenness of these 9 statements; though the LaVeyans didn't say it. I'm saying
it.
People misread these statements while other normal healthy types wonder
what they could mean because they are just too obvious, too simple. A normal animal
or person understands the most simple of things: "I LIKE, I WANT, I DO," or "I
DO NOT LIKE, DO NOT WANT, DO NOT DO." This is not even something we have to THINK
ABOUT: it's so automatic it is INSTINCT. E.g., food tastes bad? SPIT IT OUT. When
you eat it in order to please another, that is a TYPE of abstinence or self-effacement
that klippoths all do, but this is something that animals CAN NOT do and WOULD
NOT do unless they were forced. So who's forcing humans to do it? Being
forced would lead to a desire to get vengeance, by any means necessary - and here
comes the rebel. And so these statements mean a whole other thing when you REALLY
read them in the inner and real sense.
We creative healthy animals tend
to TALK creatively. Others take their FAITH seriously and don't have a creative
bone in their dead, stiff bodies. Other types often try to create new "mystery"
religions with "dark words" for the concepts. Most of them are inversionist Christians.
Devil Worshipers. Some of them are "tee hee PEE PEE tee hee" idiots that think
they can "shock the herd" because they were REJECTED by the herd that they wanted
so much to be a part of. Others are into "BOO." Well, heh, non-existent vampires
and werewolves and demonic images are not scary when there are real live terrorists
out there that have weapons of mass destruction. BOO!
The 1966 COS
was fond of saying that EVIL was LIVE spelled backwards. True. It is. And the
word VILE is an anagram for the word LIVE. So they aspire to be Biblical or Webster's
Dictionary Satanists? Yes, they sure do - take a look at them! They often dress
in the attire of the Catholic Priest and speak in Latin.
But what IS evil
for real, as defined by people really from genuinely LHP cultures out there? This
isn't something that most neo-Satanist even think about, especially since it was
done to them, repeatedly, in their lives and especially since they perpetuate
it and do it to others.
EVIL: That which makes you WEAK.
--Third Level
Clarity Freemason, Nietzsche.
EVIL: That which seeks to come between the
heart and what it loves.
--Fourth or Fifth Level Clarity Mason, Goethe, Amalia
Lodge
EVIL: That which takes an Innocent living-creature of nature, born
with a wonderment at life and born with perfect instincts, and turns that creature
against itself completely, severing it from its own inborn nature and instilling
in it a malice for everything alive and happy. Then the Dark Flame of Life which
is JOY, inverts and becomes Fear of its own Being, and what their Being is becomes
a hopeless mystery they must then seek infinitely and never have the satisfaction
of understanding.
--Tani - Inner Truth
EVIL: Ignorance
COMPOUNDED
EVIL: Ignorance and Arrogance
--Doctrinal Definition
