In the article we sell entitled, Serpents versus Adamites,
we take the reader back to a time prior to standard history and, from a Non-Indo-European
and Non-Semitic view, present the issue of Serpents versus Adamites. The correct
title of such an article, if we were to have used non-familiar words, would have
been "Naga versus Preta." Here, this scholar presents a different
view, which we agree partly with; that is, we knew the Hebrews originated in India.
We knew this all along. He presents many similar words with similar meanings from
Sanskrit and Hebrew. However it is also known that many standard Sanskrit words
that meant good things, were kept in the early Hebrew, but with their meanings
reversed. As such, a word for instance meaning "good wife" in Sanskrit
may have meant "whore" in Hebrew.
The
links in language and meaning that this scholar has located, despite being ancient,
are not ancient enough. They belong to a period after the war with the Prachetases
which predated 6000BC. The links the author makes with the Hebrew Kaballa are
likewise mistaken since the foremost expert in Kaballa, Isaac Myers, admits that
the Hebrews got this teaching from the Turanians. What is wholly absent in this
scholar's research is the Ural-Altaic (Turanian) influence, although he mentions
the "Turanian homeland of Central Asia" and "Mount Meru" later
on - he has the wrong people living there. Dravidians did not live there, nor
did Semites - it would have been far too cold for them. Archaeological finds back
up what we are saying; not what he's saying on this issue of who lived there.
Nor are hypotheses about Dravidians occupying the entirety of India correct if
one checks with the more ancient texts. It is well known now for instance, (see
Cavalli-Sforza) that Ural Altaic people inhabited Sumeria long before the Semites
or Indo-Europeans ever got there. It is a pity that the Turanian influence is
left out of such theorizing, primarily due to be being almost wholly unknown except
in oral traditions. Even Max Muller dealt with it barely, finding it unknown.
This poses a major problem! We who are Turanian have to rely on scholars
to find out stuff and confirm our words: for example the information about Sumeria.
The information written in Serpents versus Adamites about Turanians
being there predates the FACTS discovered by scholars that verify the oral history
that we wrote down in that article.
We present
a part of this since it deals with a city called Satana.
We
do not think that the word or name "Satan" derives from this city, but
that the city was originally named after the concept of Sat. After all, concepts
come first, then words, then the founding of cities and then, finally, naming
the city. We think that "Satan" as an adversary derives from the Hebrew
turning "upside down" certain meanings of words. SAT for instance, means
Being, Boundless Darkness. Sata-rupa is Nature itself. Satta: sole Existence.
Sattva: understanding. Satya: supreme truth. Satya-yuga: the golden age of truth
and wisdom. Get our Serpents versus Adamites to find out much more - available
- see our AD.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * *
"Is There A Connection Between
Ancient Indian And Hebrew Language?"
A scholar
finds compelling evidence for ancient Indian influence on a global scale.
(ViewZone
http://www.viewzone.com/matlock.html welcomes this highly researched work by scholar, Gene D. Matlock,
which is part of his complete manuscript showing the global influence of ancient
India's culture and language. We welcome your comments and thoughts.)
See
original article at: http://www.viewzone.com/abraham2.html
From
their website:
Had you been a cartographer and
geographer working for the British East India company in the 17th and 18th centuries,
you would have found all over India thousands of Hebrew-like place names with
similar meanings in both languages as well. The map excerpt on this page shows
a small section of ancient Seuna-Desa (Zion Land) in what is now Maharashtra (to
right). At the bottom right of the excerpt is the city of Paithan, on the banks
of the river Godivari. The Indo-Hebrews named the part of the river passing through
Paithan's territory Paithan (Pison, Phison), according to their traditions. In
the upper left-hand corner is the city of Satana. (SEE MAP) According to the legends of the Yadavas (Indo-Hebrews), [Note:
the Yadava were descendents of Yadu. The founder of this line was Yadu, the son
of King Yayati of the Somavansa race. They had a kingdom of Dwaraka in Guzerat
and around 3100 BC the Yadava city was submerged by the ocean. The many outside
the city survived.] Satana would have made the folks in Sodom and Gomorah envious.
The Seunas and the Satanas decided to resolve their moral and religious differences
on the battlefield. The forces of "Satan" lost, but their defeat didn't
dishearten them. Eventually, we came to think of "Satan" as a being
who lost the battle but not the war. The bible tells us that such a peace treaty
hasn't yet been signed between these two ancient enemies.
In
that part of India, the holiest of holies for the Indians, the names of many towns
end in the appendage gaon. In Hebrew, gaon means "genius; great rabbinical
scholar." Also in this region is an area that was once the favorite of Yadava
royalty: Nashik, the exact Hebrew name for "Royal Prince." Satan is
near the district called Khandesh (Land of Cain). There is also a Kodesh. Kod
and Khad are Sanskrit terms for "First," "The Beginning,"
or "God." In Hebrew, Khadesh = "The first day of a Jewish calendar
month." Notice that all these names have similar meanings and religious connotations
in both languages. I invite my readers to investigate this anomaly for themselves.
The similarity of these Indian and Hebrew names
certainly traumatized European colonists. Unwilling to admit that the Jews had
never sprouted spontaneously in the Arabian desert, or were from outer space as
I read recently, but were from the East as the bible itself tells us, they merely
erased these matters from their minds or convinced themselves that they were "coincidences,"
even though the "coincidences" numbered in the thousands and were peppered
over every region in India.
A 19th Century British
Scholar Explains Why the Western World Never Learned About the Indian Origins
of the Jews.
Though not generally known in this
day and age, Godfrey Higgins (1772-1833), archeologist, politician, humanitarian,
social reformer, and author, was one of the most enlightened and educated men
of early 19th century England. He was a well-known iconoclast, rationalist, and
admirer of the Jews, who vehemently opposed any kind of persecution of this ancient
religious group. He wrote two oversized volumes, totaling around 1600 pages of
fine print, about the Jews' Indian origins. These two volumes, entitled Anacalypsis,
are extremely rare. The last printing was done in 1965 by University Books, NY.
It's a difficult book to read because the author painstakingly proved the minutest
of details in his dissertation. Even good readers need several weeks to finish
it.
The first printing consisted of only 200
copies, twenty of which he had to give away. Only a few of the remaining 180 copies
were sold. For nearly thirty years, the religious communities of England and Europe
quietly suppressed the book. It has since been reprinted three times, but including
the first printing, the total copies printed never totaled over a thousand. Only
occasionally can it be found in a library. Even so, many authors have quoted and
plagiarized it. Not a few spiritual charlatans, such as fraudulent mystics, psychics,
and the Presbyterian preacher who wrote the novel on which The Book of Mormon
is based, used Anacalypsis to produce their respective heresies and agendas. The
famous 19th century mystic and founder of Theosophy, Madam Blavatsky, took advantage
of the world's nearly total ignorance of this magnificent document, using much
of Higgin's information, to convince the gullible that she had acquired her "mystical
knowledge" from "otherworldly" sources called "Akashic records."
Godfrey Higgins gave an opinion that I have always
espoused, which explains in part why the similarities of peoples, languages, philosophies,
and place names between India and the Middle East became lost to the memory of
mankind after Christianity and Islam took over the West.
Aramaic,
a language as similar to Hebrew as Spanish is to Portuguese, originated in Afghanistan
and Pakistan. Both Afghanistan and Pakistan were once part of India. Afghanistan
seceded from Indian in the 1700s. Pakistan was cut out of India when the two nations
were partitioned after World War II. Aramaic also is the source of modern Hebrew's
square alphabet, used in Israel today. The Hebrew square alphabet and the truth
that Hebrew is just an Aramaic dialect confirm the Indian origin of the Jews.
Those Christian and Jewish authorities who don't
want it to be true that ten to thirty million Jews once lived in Afghanistan,
Pakistan, and Northwestern India say that it is just a "coincidence"
that so many tribes and places there have biblical names. Others insist that the
Moslems christened all those tribes and places. As Godfrey Higgins tells us, many
of those tribes and places had already received their so-called "biblical
names" millenniums before Islam was a gleam in Mohammed's eyes and many centuries
before those same names started showing up in the Middle East. Some of Israel's
tribal and place names also started appearing in Afghanistan, Kashmir, and Northwestern
India when Sargon II and Nebuchadnezzar exiled most of the Jews to that part of
the world. The confusion about the origin of those tribal and place names will
always exist as long as we stubbornly refuse to give the Indo-Hebrews their rightful
place in history. The Aryans and Indo-Hebrews began to overrun parts of India
and the Middle East around 2000 BC, perhaps more than a thousand years previously
if there is any truth to the story about the progeny of Noah.
Somehow,
our brainwashed minds blank out the fact that the Ancient Egyptian and Akkadian
names for Hebrew, Habiru and Apiru were derived from Indo-Hebrew dialects and
meant "Sons of Ophir." The truth about the origins of the Hebrews has
been screaming in our faces for thousands of years, but our benumbed minds have
chosen not to hear it.
* * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * *
In Serpents versus Adamites, we explain ABRAHM
= ABRAHAM. That's in the Hebrew Torah (Bible). But Abrahm means not-Brahman!
This scholar seems to have overlooked that detail! We detail the Chandravansa
and Suryavansa, something so well known today in India that everyone knows if
they are from the Chandravansa or Suryavansa line! It's as well known as "Sicily
or Italy" is to Italians when you ask them what their "nationality"
is. Italians often do not consider Sicilians to be the same people.
Back to Satanic
Reds index
