by Satan's Commissar Bren,
ProletariatNote:
this article is written tongue-in-cheek, intended to mock out both Commie and
anti-Commie crusaders. It is not intended as an endorsement of a Bolshevik or
Communist political agenda in the USA or anywhere else.
First
a dialogue with some questions and answers from recent commentary. The commentary
arose due to this article appearing in The Black Flame (COS Magazine).
When one considers all the pro Nazi stuff and guff over that, and/or hoolah over
Hitler, interviews with Klansmen and all that, one must find it remarkable that
such guff arose over ONE article pointing out what was Satanic in the Soviet System.
It would seem that Cruxtoid propaganda is good enough to even fool the so-called
"Satanists" out there who can't think for themselves but who react,
in knee-jerk fashion, at the mere suggestion that SOMETHING Satanic this way came.
See also "COS Member from Soviet System - on Education"
on this website.
Kari Nevala who lived in a Socialist
system wrote, in answer to a post:
Someone said:
> The people will always screw it up, because
Marxism ignores
> human nature rule #1, which is:
>
> --
People act in accordance with their own self-interest
>
> Anything
(be it economic, political, or metaphysical) which
> violates this principle
will fail. Period, dot, end of
> statement.
Kari
said:
Without getting to what you mean by "Marxism,"
or what human nature is like, why would basic "Marxism" be a violation
against self-interest? As I see it, the only way it violates the self-interests
of some people is that it doesn't give much chance to have the self-delusion
of being a part of some elite. After all, most of the people who support very
elitistic systems (like for example monarchy), do so only because it's their only
way of feeling good about themselves. Through the monarch, they can feel self-worth.
Of course it is herdish at best (gaining "worth" from being a part of
the group), and delusional at best. Leftists hated all that shit. They hated the
Crown as much as they hated the Church.
Why would
it be in the self-interests of people, then? If you are a worker, as most people
are, you get better rights and more money. If you are an artist or scientist,
you get to do what you do without having to worry about making huge profit.
Someone
said:
> My big problem with it is that it
HAS NEVER FUCKING WORKED
> ANYPLACE IT HAS BEEN TRIED!
Again,
I am not sure what you mean by Marxism, but for example many of the Nordic countries
(i.e. Denmark, Sweden, Finland) had a rather Marxist system, and the living standards
were very high (if not the highest in the world).
Someone
said:
> Since Communism or Socialism or what-have-you
places the
> welfare of the People as a group over the welfare of each
> individual, would not that be totally against what Satanism
> about,
just for that alone?
Kari said:
What
these movements have fought for, has not been to put the welfare of the
group over the welfare of the individual, but to put the welfare of the WORKER
over the welfare of the CORPORATION, Crown (nation, retarded inherited nobility)
and Church. They hated the Crown and Church so much, that they killed the nobility
and literally destroyed the Churches. Yeah, they didn't SPEAK about "might
is right" - they actually acted, used their might, to MAKE things right.
Someone
said:
> How can a State telling you: "Labour
for the good of the
> people and subvert yourself totally!" be beneficial
to any
> single person?
Kari said:
That
is capitalism! Just replace people with company. The whole essence of leftism
is to fight for the rights of the workers OVER the tyranny of the corporations.
It means better salary, better working conditions, better health service, better
education, better public services (like libraries, parks, theaters etc.) amongst
other things.
Someone said:
>
Maybe I'm just a selfish beast, but the best incentive to
> get me to do
things is for there to be benefit *to me* of
> some kind, in any given
situation. I'm not thinking about
> benefiting mankind as a whole, I just
want to get paid. I
> think thats pretty much hard-wired into most of the
human
> race.
Kari said:
That's
exactly the historical root of leftism. To fight to get paid for what you
do, instead of working your skin off from generation to generation and still getting
so little money that you can only barely survive. Humans are not robots who are
happy to do their dull work their entire lives. Humans want joy and mental stimulation.
Thus the people fought against tyranny of corporations, Crown (nationalism, fascism
- self-sacrifice for the good of the nation) and Church. It was rebellion based
on a sense of self-worth. Rebellion against the tyranny of unjustified authority.
Someone
said:
> I do not see how one can reconcile
holding oneself as the
> highest power and the State telling you what to
do at the
> same time.
Kari said:
Exactly!
Power to yourself - power to people, instead of corporations, nations or Churches!
Someone said:
>
If Communism worked, would not Cuba and China not be
> practically Third-World
countries after decades of Socialist
> rule?
Kari
said:
Nordic countries (such as Denmark, Sweden
and Finland) had very leftist/socialist systems (while they had no arms industry
to build up), and they had extremely high living standards, and still do. Though
the living standards aren't as high anymore, as the capitalist forces have gained
more power. Where as we used to get paid well, have lots of free services (paid
into as a pool and used as a pool) and free time, we now get paid badly, have
to work a lot more to make ends meet, and have worse public services (many of
which aren't free anymore). Still these countries are definetly one of the top
countries of the whole world, when it comes to high living standards. (Note that
no one placed an embargo on Nordic countries or fought a Cold War with them; nor
was the wealth of Nordic countries depleted on making weapons and having an arms
race. Such things destroy any hope of Socialism being built anywhere.)
Someone
Said
> I am -not- taking 'sides', and I have
no interest in a flame
> war.
Kari said:
Neither
do I.
Someone said:
>
At first glance I would say that the quality of life of any
> individual
is entirely dependent on that individual. One makes
> choices, and one's
quality of life or level of happiness is
> the result of those choices.
Kari
said:
I agree with this. I am not speaking for
tolerance or incompetence, but the very opposite. Let there be no privileges to
help incompetent ones.
Someone said:
>
I do not buy into the idea that some people are 'repressed'
> or 'held
back' by current society or government, and
> therefore 'cannot' improve
their own lives or achieve that
> which they wish to achieve.
Kari
said:
This is true, when it comes to "most
of the people living in the western world." Still there is the fundamental
question: why would I not want a higher quality of life for me, instead
of a higher quality for some corporation or state.
Someone
said:
> If this 'repressed' theory was true,
America would not exist.
> Think about it.
> Also, if a country
is not profitable, how could those that
> live in said country be profitable?
Kari
said:
I think it comes down to the balance between
economical wealth of the state and the happiness of the people. Both sides have
their own political interest groups. Leftists happen to be the ones in favor
of enjoyable lives, while right wing would prefer slave labor. Of course it's
not that simple in practice today.
Someone said:
> However, the wealth of America has guaranteed
that those
> considered to be in poverty here in America are FAR better
> off than those that are truly poor in other countries.
Kari
said:
Yeah, life in the 3rd world would be a hell.
I wonder why, and also how it could be changed (by them). (Note: colonial exploitation
- that's why.)
Someone said:
>I
disagree in that I believe that capitalism is the only
> economic model
that works; again, America is a classic example
> of this. We are the wealthiest
and most powerful nation in
> the world, at present.
Kari
said:
I don't know if this is because of Capitalism
though. (Note: as a matter of fact, it is not due to capitalism which, under Pres.
Wilson, almost bankrupted the nation and did cause a depression. During the Hoover
administration, there were massive labor strikes and fears of the collapse of
capitalism, which had proven itself to be a dismal failure. The country was saved
by Roosevelt who had to institute 8 of Marx's 10 points of Socialism: he saved
the USA.)
(Another huge benefit America had in
its early pioneer stages was access for all, including the children of
poor peasants, to very cheap land that had been taken from the Native Americans
- this equal access to the means of production, agricultural land,
gave people a spirit of enthusiasm and a chance to build their lives that they
would not have had in Europe, where the land was owned by the stagnant
and oppressive aristocracy. Characterizations of the USA as having always been
a paragon of pure capitalism ignore many essential economic factors like this.)
(For real examples of nations that are
more purely capitalist – i.e., whose governments honor wealth, the pursuit
of wealth, and wealthy citizens above all else – look to the "banana
republics" of South and Central America and Africa. Or modern Russia.)
Someone
said:
> Capitalism is Satanic; it celebrates
and rewards the
> individual. Socialism and communism reward the herd.
Kari
said:
Capitalism rewards the corporations, not
the individuals. Capitalism is populistic and extremely herdish: it is driven
by the hysterical "needs" of the consumer herd (and the interests of
the corporations). Its goal is maximal economical profitability. Capitalism is
at it's best when the workers are slaves.
On the
contrary: Socialism rewards those who actually produce things. It doesn't tolerate
parasites living on the work of others. Its goal is high quality of living and
rationally guided society. Different people get different wages, they get promoted
into better positons etc just like in capitalist systems.
Someone
said:
> Catering to those that cannot or more
likely choose not to take
> care of themselves, by giving them welfare
aka: re-distributing
> the wealth of the nation, denies the very essence
of Satanism.
Kari said:
And
how much is this a real issue? There naturally is no system that wants or tolerates
parasites. There are just a couple of different ways to get rid of them.
Simple
fact: more people are on welfare now, than were back then. The Socialist system
encouraged people to work. Not only were wages good, but you also got all kinds
of extra benefits. In the USSR, if you refused to work, you got sent to the camps
in Siberia. They did not tolerate parasites.
Historically,
leftism was extreme activism. They were not stupid herd-minded passive drones
saying, "yes sir". They were the antithesis of that mentality.
(However, if you are looking for mindless slaves who do what they are told without
question, look no further than the typical American corporate drone or trailer
trash, who will defend capitalism as undoubtably the "best system of the
world" at the drop of a dime.)
Someone said:
> Satanism is about individuals. If an individual
works and
> achieves and thereby gains monetary wealth, what Satanist
> would say 'nay' to that?
Yeah, exactly. See
above. Individuals that work versus corporations, see above.
end
dialogue
Seeing Red:
Satanism
is a philosophy of the occult, of ideas and knowledge considered taboo or dangerous
by civilized humanity and, above all, all of its so-called "moral teachers,"
from Socrates and Jesus, to Buber, Pope John, Schweitzer, et al. In the twentieth
century, perhaps no topic has been more maligned, distorted, and reviled by the
theologians, moralists, scholars, and politicians in the Western world than the
subject of Marxism, Communism, and the Stalinist Soviet Union. When these pundits
and preachers speak out against something so unilaterally and with such rabid
fervor, as they did with Darwinism and Marxism, it is almost a sure sign that
there is SOMETHING Satanic about it!
Three of
the thinkers with the greatest influence on twentieth century Western intellectual
life and popular culture are Sigmund Freud, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Karl Marx.
All of these were noted atheists with damning insight into the cherished social
order and illusions of civilized humanity, and had much to say against humanity's
enshrined leaders and teachers. Freud disputed the teachings of Moses, Nietzsche
attacked Socrates and Jesus, but Marx criticized Hegel, Jesus, you name him! Despite
this, it seems that educated Satanists are familiar with Satanic elements in the
thought of Freud and Nietzsche, yet unfortunately ignorant of such ideas in Marxism.
Part of the reason for this is that in American colloquialism, "socialism"
has become synonymous with inefficient bureaucracy, state-imposed tyranny over
the personal lives of citizens, the welfare state, and some hare-brained programs
that destroyed the educational system in this country, thanks to the efforts of
certain self-hating American Leftists during the Cold War era (who are NOW known
to have been funded by the POST-Stalinist Soviet Union, which had openly vowed
to "bury" the USA!). It should be pointed out from the start that these
characterizations are inaccurate representations and outright LIES about old-style
Marxism and the social reality in the Soviet Union under Stalin.
The
basis of Marxism is a hard-bitten analysis of human society, reducing culture
to a manifestation of peoples' real-world physical environments and labor (e.g.,
what you think is determined by what you DO), and the history of civilization
to the struggle over resources (class struggle). Karl Marx is famous for his biting
observation that "religion is the opium of the masses"; in fact, Marxism
has been THE PRIMARY enemy of religion in history.
Of
interest to Satanists, Marxist dialectical materialism takes the dark, entropic
force in nature (Satan) AS GIVEN. Dialectical Materialism envisions a cosmos of
constant flux where even apparent stability is only a mask of never-ceasing forces
of creation, growth, and destruction (a model validated by modern quantum physics).
Karl Marx observed Europe in the midst of the
Industrial Revolution, when Industrial Capitalism was JUST ARISING, a world where
the old classes of artisans and talented workers were being replaced by machines,
and downtrodden masses increasingly groveled under the whim of a handful of parasitic
millionaires (who often compensated for their despicable behavior with lame moralistic
"philanthropic" platitudes), where life was SHIT and barely worth living
for the vast majority of people, and where human beings themselves became commodities
sold on the market as "slaves."
Marx's
idea was that once things got bad enough, the workers of the world would wake
up and UNITE to smash their arrogant overlords, and then establish a "dictatorship
of the proletariat" where THE PEOPLE ruled, instead of licking some aristocratic
asshole's dainty little high-priced feet for a pay raise. By then, capitalism
will have developed technology, factories, etc., which can then be used by the
majority under communism. Anyone who has watched the movie "Stargate"
will recognize this scenario where the humans overthrow the parasite Ra using
its own technology.
One point in Marx that might
be of interest to Satanists is his definition of labor. In Das Kapital,
Marx defines the value of a product biologically (or physiologically, as Marx
terms it) as "expenditure of human labor-power." A product has no inherent
value in itself; only by applying work (from humans) does the product attain a
higher value. Of course a product has value based on its demand, but it FIRST
has to be made: BY WORKERS. Work is worth the human labor-power expended. A capitalist
is one that pays a person less than what his work is worth, that is, the capitalist
does not reimburse the worker of his expended labor-power. (Meaning that very
often the workers making the product can not even afford to buy the product for
themselves, or it costs 10 or more times what he got paid to make it.) (Compare
standard of living to Scandinavian countries - no comparison!) From a Satanic
perspective, labor-power is the black flame, which drives people to create. A
capitalist is one that doesn't have the black flame, and instead needs to derive
the labor-power from someone else. Exploitation then means to "steal"
the black flame from someone. Satanists are people that honor that black flame
above all superficial trinkets. That should put things into perspective in regards
to what kinds of people are capitalists, and what what kinds aren't.
Many
of the super-rich of the Capitalist world are hungry souls driven by an inner
lacking, a black hole in their hearts, that they unsuccessfully seek to fill with
material luxury and the trappings of the "high life." (This INFINITE,
INSATIABLE greed is fundamentally different from the normal, FINITE biological
desire for happiness and pleasure.) They are truly damned people, unable to experience
the Innocent, Satanic joy a child feels eating a delicious ice cream sundae or
running through a sprinkler. These agonized people create misery in the world
because they are unable to experience joy. Some are so driven by jealousy they
seek out happy, creative people to enslave and torture. George Soros is one such
person. Like Christians, these people sometimes speak deceptively beautiful but
essentially empty maxims and doctrines (e.g., "freedom of the individual,"
an "open society") to fool people into believing them. As Satanists
know, such real-life monsters can be known not by their WORDS, but by the FRUITS
of their deeds.
150 years after "The Communist
Manifesto" was written, Capitalist economists are gradually beginning to
come upon the rudiments of Marxist thought, which was Marx formulated BEFORE the
American Civil War, without realizing it, and CERTAINLY not admitting it. Right
now, the cutting edge of economics is finally incorporating EMPIRICAL real-world
data, and beginning to realize that many of the notions of "classical"
economics are dead wrong. Meanwhile, Marx's correct predictions about the inevitable
tendency towards monopoly, class division (which must NOW be seen on a global
scale, with "Third World" workers at the bottom of the barrel), and
never-ceasing expansion can be verified by a glance through the popular press.
Nevertheless, Marx's prescient theories are still arrogantly dismissed as "nonsense"
or "totalitarian" by herd brainwashed by Cold War indoctrination. The
first reason why so much energy has been devoted to discrediting Marxism in the
West should be blatantly obvious to any realist asking, "Who benefits?":
America is a proudly capitalist country (despite the fact FDR instituted 8 of
Marx's 10 points from the "Communist Manifesto"), and the powers that
be don't want to be overthrown.
However, there
is also a subtler and more Satanic reason why even a dirt-poor American will give
a spirited defense of the virtue of capitalism: in a Capitalist world, Karl Marx's
theory dismisses all cherished illusions that we live in the best kind of society,
that our wealth or poverty is our just deserts, etc., the kind of rosy ideas that
many Americans (and others) find so essential to their flimsy grip on sanity.
Marxism says that not only is American consumerist Capitalism not the "enlightened,"
"moral", "highest form of human civilization" it imagines
itself to be, but that, to the contrary, it is a chaotic, diseased, confused,
insanely destructive, and supremely WASTEFUL society that not only relies on the
exploitation of the less-degenerate (Islamic SHITHOLES excluded) Third World for
physical labor and places to sell its JUNK-- contrary to deluded, bleeding-heart
missionary-like liberal "humanitarians" who imagine that the USA is
really "HELPING" those people), but is also so sick that it is a dangerous,
stressful, unhealthy trash heap within its own borders, or, at best, a repressed,
Stepfordesque society of Christian consumerist clones and lunatics so broken by
their own upbringings that they cannot even enjoy the material wealth they drain
out of their colonies.
THE BIG LIE of Western
capitalism and its apologists is that ONLY THEIR system upholds human rights,
rather than tramples on them; a claim that CANNOT stand up to objective, intelligent
historical scrutiny. Satanists should remember that the period of the strongest
and most adamant defamation of Communism in the USA was during the nineteen fifties
and sixties, an era when parents were shocked by the Beatles' ONE INCH too long
hair, Elvis could only be shown from the waist up on television, social life consisted
of "keeping up with the Joneses," et cetera ad nauseam: an era so utterly,
disgustingly conformist that all its self-deluded judgements of foreign societies
are utterly and completely INVALIDATED.
Ever since
its inception in 1917, when Lenin and his gang of Bolsheviks overthrew Kerensky's
asskissing government and said a big "FUCK YOU" to the Czarist royalty,
Orthodox religious establishment, and the greedy, bloodsucking capitalists of
the West, volumes have been written about the "Evil Empire," claiming
to expose the supposed failure of its famous Five Year programs, its suppression
of "individual rights," the horror of its purges, etc. However, the
reader should realize that the history of the Soviet Union has long been instinctively
hidden away from the prying eyes of the West, concealed behind a Hermetic seal
of secrecy and illusion. Now that the Iron Curtain has officially fallen, a trained
eye MIGHT discern a few GLIMPSES of this vast and utterly ALIEN empire amid the
cluttered morass of propaganda (from BOTH sides).
However,
the Satanic inquirer should never forget that, contrary to foolish American perceptions,
the realms of the Soviet Union are NOT European or Western, but Asiatic. They
are not Asian as in Chinese or Japanese, but Asiatic as in Genghis Khan and the
Golden Horde, Asiatic as in Attila the Hun, Tamerlane, Gog and Magog, Asiatic
as in the Turanians, the only people who had the Dark Doctrine in an undiluted
form; this is the domain of the unknown Central Asian Paleoarctic "Yellow
Peril" before which the petty civilized Christian nations in Western Europe
trembled in abject terror, that their Popes have labeled as Satan Incarnate and
considered the people as being from "Tartarus." The manic-depressive
Winston Churchill's fanatic reactions and efforts against the Bolshevik Revolution
parallel those of Pope Leo and others to the rise of the Khans in the East in
the medieval twelfth and thirteenth centuries. This is the Asia that Western history
has tried to forget, until Vladimir Ulyanov, the son of a Kalmuck and a Slav,
overthrew the European Czar's regime and raised the Red flag over his vast inherited
empire. It is no wonder that the once cowering Capitalist Christian West to this
day considers Stalin's USSR the Devil with which HITLER had to make a deal! This
ANCIENT Western prejudice against the peoples of the Soviet Union, which dates
back at LEAST to Roman times, might explain some of the paranoia surrounding this
nation.
Note: I want to make it perfectly clear
that I am NOT talking about the post-Stalinist USSR that came into being after
Khrushchev pulled a coup d'etat and decapitated the NKVD. I will make it
perfectly clear right now that this NKVD, which, under Stalin, patrolled every
economic sector to ensure honesty, is most definitely NOT the KGB, a totally separate
organization that existed alongside it, and who were as corrupt as any state police
in the USA could be corrupt without their own department of internal affairs being
there to catch them. From the onset of Khrushchev's takeover, the economics became
state capitalist; that's NOT socialism, and it's certainly not Communism.
With
that technicality aside, let us try to cover a few points about the Soviet Union
pertinent to the Satanist. Despite what American liars try to say in futile attempts
to escape the reality of their OWN wretchedly conformist lives, the USSR was not
a giant welfare state, nor was it an Orwellian empire of brainwashed zombiefied
drones (although we cannot say the same about Maoist China). Lenin's socialist
motto was "if you don't WORK, you don't EAT," and Stalin's Soviet Union
was one of the STRICTEST meritocracies in history, where people (whether male
OR female) were given their due for EVERY kind of work they did, including the
nitty-gritty manual labor that is always arrogantly sneered at by the withered
corpses in degenerate societies who fancy themselves "above" such PHYSICAL
activity; and incompetence was given no excuses. The petty classist, sexist, and
racist biases against manual, female, and (more recently) nonwhite laborers have
prevented the Western nations from EVER being anything even APPROACHING meritocracies.
Under Stalin's socialist regime, if you were
going to be a dishwasher, be the best, because you have the public health in your
hands. If you were going to be a doctor, do not hold yourself away from your patients,
or talk over their heads, because it is these people that paid for your education,
and if your knowledge does not benefit the people of your society, then it is
useless. Remember, EVERY occupation has its native jargon. Both a doctor and a
dishwasher are fundamentally responsible for public health, and both took pride
in their work in Stalinist society: this is the meaning of "from each according
to their ability, to each according to their needs." This Communist slogan
does NOT mean that the physically healthy should toil for the sake of degenerate
corpse-rotten vampires. In fact, two Stalinist epithets for such human leeches
were "cannibal" and "vampire," and these also applied to those
who made their billions on the backs of the able-bodied people that they enslaved.
Lenin's motto for the stage of Socialism or BUILDING Communism in the Soviet Union
was "from each according to their ability, to each according to their WORK."
These
demanding standards that stratified Soviet society according to natural ability
have drawn much derision from Westerners, but it is an undeniable fact that even
AFTER the degeneration after Stalin's death had set in, the USSR CONTINUED to
produce the world's finest scientists and athletes, setting a standard the West
didn't hope to even COMPARE to (much less surpass) until the USA managed to "win"
its self-initiated "race to the moon," a showpiece of propaganda for
Kennedy (the Soviets had not been competing with anyone with regards to space
travel). Nevertheless, the USSR was far ahead in all other aspects of space science:
they launched Sputnik, the first man-made satellite, had the first cosmonaut,
made the first photographs of the moon, etc. Kennedy's moon landing was a CRASH
program to CATCH UP to these historical Soviet achievements.
To
this day, standard Soviet college ENTRANCE questions are sought after in the USA
by "math whizzes" and professors looking for a "genius-level"
mathematical puzzle! Unlike in America, where most scientists must grovel for
research grants, often compromising their true ideas to corporate interests or,
even worse, living in abject poverty, the Soviet Union enshrined the scientists
whose work benefited the WHOLE society, including many Satanic figures such as
the defamed, derided, and distorted Ukrainian botanist Trofim Lysenko, who was
described by his Western-supported Mendelian adversaries as a mrakobes
("demon of darkness!"), was known to understand the plants on the fields
like a shaman would, and befuddled his enemies with an impressive gutter mouth
along with a penchant for then-"cryptic" metaphorical descriptions of
life processes that have since been verified by modern science. Despite what LIARS
say now AFTER the fact, his agricultural techniques FED the people, and he was
promoted by Stalin to be the head of biological science in the Soviet Union. Is
it not coincidental that it was this country that later honored Anton LaVey, whose
ancestors hailed from these Eastern lands, in its Museum of Atheism?
As
for the much-hyped "brainwashing" attributed to the Soviet Union and
other Communist countries, such as Maoist China, Satanists should not be disappointed
to hear that the official school of psychology in the Soviet union was Pavlovianism
(not psychology at all, but neurophysiology), which is famous for its drooling
dogs and ringing bells. Stalin's regime tried to create a "New Man"
by manipulation of the social environment, removing stimuli that produce broken
people and neurotic antisocial behaviors, and encouraging those that build healthy,
functional humans. Despite what humanitarians imagine about the people in such
regimes, the average citizen of the USSR in Stalin's times did not FEEL oppressed,
because they were happy with their lives, which were affluent with material animal
comfort (unlike the average person in a stressful Hobbesian capitalist society).
In this Pavlovian school of psychology, the disassociated
non-limbic "spiritual" types of people WERE considered insane, in contrast
to THIS society, where such types are considered the "Norm," or even
GLORIFIED as ROLE MODELS: neurotics and psychotics like Mother Theresa, Winston
Churchill, Cardinal Spellman, etc. In the Soviet Union, those who showed a lack
of interest in carnal life, for example, teenage boys who weren't horny for girls,
were suspected of "creeping schizophrenia." In fact, that Pavlovian
school of neurophysiology, which is so offensive to human illusions of what B.F.
Skinner called "freedom and dignity," is verified by recent hard-science
neurology findings, such as the work of Dr. Antonio Damasio, whose book "Descartes'
Error" thoroughly discredited Western mind-body dualism, and sparked the
recent fad in "Emotional Intelligence."
As
for "thoughtcrime," people were not arrested for what they thought about
the government, as the case of the Christian scientist Pavlov demonstrates: he
was never arrested, nor were people who voiced sincere discontent over policies.
However, people WERE arrested for such crimes as screwing up on important jobs,
wasting money (The People's resources!), and other things that Westerners pretend
were "trivial, innocent mistakes"---in an era of real sabotage in the
face of a war of annihilation. As such, many people who were simply emotionally
confused, unaware waste products (whose unconscious exploits fill Freud's books)
were eliminated along with avowed enemies of society. Since these unaware types
fill American society, their arrests might be seen as inhuman. We Satanists say,
"Good riddance!" Ironically, it is America's refusal to deal decisively
with some classes of such angry incompetents, destroyers, and obstructers (as
the Stalinists tried to do) that has CREATED the modern American "welfare"
system of spending billions of tax dollars for certain parasites to stay home
and raise illegitimate, unemployable and usually asocial children. However, many
right wing American politicians complain about parasites of the "welfare
queen" variety. What differentiates these right wingers from the Stalinists
is that the Stalinists targeted ALL parasites equally, instead of prosecuting
only those from a certain class or race, as Americans usually do. (One Corporation
alone gets more tax-payer funded WELFARE than all the "welfare queens"
combined!)
Since the USSR was created by people
who had been, by their own admission, literally on the cultural level of New Guinea
savages, their social life had not been poisoned by the decadence typical of the
civilized Western world, where is it normal for children to hate their parents,
pick on their friends, hate themselves, repress their emotions and sexuality,
et cetera (which is one reason Westerners fail to grasp the nature of Soviet society).
However, the Soviet Union was not completely free of the degenerate types described
above (as attested to by the confused moralistic whinings of such anti-Communist
"luminaries" as Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Mikovan Djilas and the Medvedev
brothers), and these dissatisfied (with THEMSELVES) people plagued Stalin's new
regime. The existence of genuine industrial saboteurs and Vragi Naroda
(Enemies of the People) in Stalin's times is attested to by non-political and
even anti-Communist American first-hand observers, such as recorded by United
States Ambassador to the Soviet Union John Davies.
These
discontents, which included both people with relatively normal motives such as
nationalism, as well as genuine mental degenerates, were dealt with in a period
of sweeping purges by the NKVD (People's Commissariat of Internal Affairs), who
were infamous in the West as agents of the Stalinist Terror, and who were THE
EPITOME of a truly Satanic police force. The NKVD was responsible for cleaning
out the garbage in Soviet society, and did so with terrifying efficiency: they
apprehended not only criminals, but also their extended families, friends, spouses,
and anyone connected with them. This sort of thoroughness strikes most Jewish
and Christian Westerners as paranoid, bloodthirsty, and excessive, but a Satanist
might note that all of those people were either physically related to the criminal,
or they associated with the criminal of their own free will. As the saying goes,
you can judge a man by the friends he keeps, and recent scientific findings about
the hereditary and familial nature of personality and mental disease make these
methods seem very reasonable, if perhaps "unethical" by Judeo-Christian
standards.
Another aspect of NKVD operations
that might interest the Satanist is that NKVD officers were not content with merely
catching criminals and then presenting evidence of their guilt and then exiling
jailing or executing them. They made the guilty admit the reality of what they
did and then insisted that they admit WHY they did it. Of course, after many denials
of "I didn't do it," the guilty ones came clean (the innocent were let
go, but one never hears about the innocent in propaganda). This is the Satanic,
Asian "Durga" method of forcing someone to not just spit out a phony
excuse but painfully dig into their souls to remember what DESIRE compelled them
to commit crimes against their society, which often involved seeing some buried
awful TRUTH about oneself, a process to which most people would find DEATH preferable.
Sometimes these criminals would be brought before the citizenry and international
media for "show trials," where they would publicly confess to what they
had done and why. Western scholars usually dismiss these trials and confessions
as faked, but, for one example, experienced lawyer John Davies considered the
testimony at the famous Bukharin trial to be genuine, and he was a first-hand
observer who had no political agenda or reason to distort the truth.
The
NKVD was the internal police force of the Soviet Union that fought corruption
and prevented counter-revolution, and when Khrushchev had his violent coup
d'etat after Stalin's death, the first thing he did was dismantle it in order
to instate his poisonous state-capitalist programs. From then on, Communism was
doomed in the Soviet Union, and life there was not the same and destined to get
increasingly bad. The Soviet economy (which was already severely crippled by World
War 2) was strained to collapse by excessive military expenditure in the Cold
War. All of Khrushchev's rhetoric about de-Stalinization and the "crimes"
of Stalinism were a COVER for his vile destruction of the USSR, and people who
had lived through the era of a man who had made their country great, despite poverty
and a war that wiped out one third of their new industrial achievements, were
horrified to hear him derided as a criminal.
According
to the recently published memoirs of Anatoly Dobrynin, former member of the Central
Committee of the Party and Soviet Ambassador to Washington for 24 years (1962-1986),
Gorbachev, the West's little "hero," is as much to blame for the collapse
of the Soviet Union as Khrushchev. Dobrynin says that Khrushchev kept antagonizing
the U.S. military (this kind of antagonism doesn't work for a SOCIALIST system)
and this misdirected Soviet energies to war, (instead of building their Socialist
society) while Gorbachev's "wonderful reforms" (as the West thinks)
unleashed chaos and confusion that Dobrynin says Gorby, could not even understand
or deal with. Gorby was too hasty and did not understand economic problems (as
Stalin DID), and became increasingly helpless as "glasnost" progressed.
According to Dobrynin, Gorbachev did not know how to deal with "practical
problems" (sound familiar?). Now Mikhail Gorbachev works in Pizza Hut commercials.
Let us not forget that WWII destroyed almost everything the Soviets under Stalin
had built. An arms build up is not the way to build socialism; it anything it
destroys it.
Now that the Iron Curtain has fallen,
the many detractors of Communism have loudly proclaimed the victory of "freedom
of the individual" and "democracy." Meanwhile, the former Soviet
Union has become a Hobbesian cesspool of massive starvation, crime, and all of
the other HELLISH results of confused humans struggling for survival (however,
it is not nearly as bad as EVERY SINGLE American inner city is; of course, the
capitalists won't be happy until it is). The nation that rose from literally MEDIEVAL
social and technological conditions to become a world superpower, to build the
world's first space station, and to give HOPE of a better future for humanity,
has been degraded to a level where its former General Secretary can be seen on
American television peddling for Pizza Hut. THIS is where the "free market"
road to profit incentives and unnecessary "luxuries" (of consumer SUCKERISM
where people don't even enjoy the JUNK, such as the HIDEOUS $150 sneakers popular
with school-age ghetto dwellers and their selfless imitators)
They,
or more correctly, those fools and saboteurs who bought into the Western web of
Capitalism (definition: the greedy, desperate searching after material TRINKETS
by those attempting to fill up a black VORTEX inside themselves), have brought
the Soviet Union: to utter DEGENERACY, REAL bread lines, a society without even
medical care, and, of course, a resurgence of Christianity. Like most people,
the citizens of what was once Genghis Khan's empire, the impenetrable wilderness
unknown to the degenerate temperate zone civilizations, have been deceived by
the shiny, deceptively pretty SHELL and tried to snatch up the shiny and glamorous
but illusory "treasures" of Capitalism (just like the "treasures"
of Christianity) they offer, only to find crumpled-up FOIL in their hands, or
at least SOME of them have bought into this NOTHINGNESS. Perhaps when it is too
late, once they are past the point of no return and are spiraling uncontrollably
into oblivion, when they have long since sealed their own fates, they will look
back and realize that they too have forsaken something more valuable than any
ugly, overpriced "designer" suit or rip-off skimpy, bland "gourmet"
cuisine in the world: normal creature comfort, good food, loving friendship and
family, the kind of things NKVD chief Felix Dzerzhinsky called life, happiness,
and inner liberty (Dzerzhinsky had never heard of Jefferson), and that we Satanists
call vital animal existence.
Maybe they will
realize that it IS possible to have a life with material comfort and luxury and
real friends and family as communal primitives do, and have it (as Gene Roddenberry
dreamed) in a MODERN technological society.
Right
now, the greedy klippoths in the American capitalist world have had their wildest
dreams fulfilled, their own big businesses are moving their operations OVERSEAS,
into the labor markets newly-opened by the fall of Communism, gradually depleting
the once prosperous standard of living in even the so-called First World. A Satanist
might have warned them, "Be careful what you wish for: you just might GET
IT."
Bibliography:
1.
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, "The Communist Manifesto."
2.
Ludo Martens, "Another View of Stalin." (Link Available on http://www.geocities.com/redcomrades/index.html under Links)
3. John Cassidy, "The
Return of Karl Marx." New York Times, October 20&27 1997, pages
248-259.
4. Bruce Bower, "Yours, Mine, and
Ours." _Science News_, Volume 153, March 28, 1998, pages 205-207.
5.
Arthur Koesstler, "Darkness at Noon."
6.
John Davies, "Mission to Moscow" (see also movie with same title).
7.
J.D. Bernal, "Science in History," (1954): second ed., Watts, 1957;
3rd
ed. 1965, also Penguin pb. (Third ed. is the
best edition).
8. J.D. Bernal, "The Biological
Controversy in the Soviet Union and its Implications," Modern Quarterly
4 (Summer 1949), 203-217.
9. J.D. Bernal, "The
Abdication of Science." Modern Quarterly 8 no.1 (1952-53), 44-50.
10.
Rius, "Marx for Beginners."
11. "Stalinist
Terror: New Perspectives" edited by J. Arch Getty and Roberta Manning.
12.
Stalin and Yezhov - an Extra-Paradigmatic View by P. Marsh (on http://www.geocities.com/redcomrades/index.html under Articles)
Back to Satanic
Reds index
